23 years to 9/11 - A potential paradigm shift on the 'official' conspiracy story

Challenging the 'official conspiracy' narrative of the "controlled demolitions"

This time last year I published a lengthy post about various aspects of the 9/11 conspiracy:

22 years to 9/11
A critical evidence-based look at the day that changed the world and where to from here.

One of the sections in the article above discusses the peculiar similarities between the damage done to cars parked in the vicinity of the towers on 9/11, and the damage done to cars in Lahaina during last year’s alleged ‘fires’ in Maui.

It includes a YouTube video of a 2012 talk by Dr. Judy Wood which presents the hypothesis that Directed Energy Weapons (or DEWs for short) were used on 9/11 to turn the towers to dust mid air.

In the above talk, Dr. Wood discusses, amongst other things, the damage caused to the cars that were parked in the vicinity of the World Trade Centre on 9/11, which looks very similar (in my very non-expert opinion) to what was seen in Maui last year.

The video below compares these side by side starting from the Maui footage and moving on to the relevant segment from the above talk:

This hypothesis completely turns on its head the ‘official conspiracy’ narrative around the towers being taken down using controlled demolition and is outlined in great detail in the book Dr. Wood wrote which contains all her evidence:

Where Did the Towers Go? | Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11

I will openly admit that I have never even heard of this book until I was exposed to it through the work in the 9/11 Revisionist publication dedicated to challenging the official conspiracy narrative around 9/11.

The work is meticulous and very detailed. I will openly admit to not being fully across all of it but I have seen enough to convince me that this is something that needs to be explored further, especially given the fact there is no doubt that Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) are REAL:

Did you know that directed energy weapons (DEWs) are real and have been used for a long time?

- Jerm

Read on Substack
Retired Air Force General Who Led U.S. Military Research Lab That Develops Directed Energy Technology Goes Missing in New Mexico | The Gateway Pundit | by Anthony Scott
A retired U.S.

There is also an increasing body of evidence suggesting that DEWs have been used to cause the Maui fires, with the weapon itself potentially being mounted on a satellite:

The Maui fires happened in 2023 but according to Dr. Wood’s allegations, this technology has been around for much longer and has definitively been used on the towers on 9/11.

This full length documentary discusses the use of DEWs on 9/11 and presents detailed evidence which I personally found compelling but would love to hear your views after you watch it:

A summary and recap of the work done by 9/11 Revisionist to-date is provided in the post below:

A 23 YEAR PSYOP - September 11, 2001
COINTELPRO Agents, disinformation peddlers and premeditated ignorance sufferers

From my perspective, I would like to present to you this video of something officially presented as a controlled demolition followed by the famous footage of WTC 7 going down in the afternoon of 9/11:

0:00
/1:43

Does that look the same to you?

If that wasn’t enough to make your head spin already, there is also the work done by Mark Conlon who focuses on the PLANES that allegedly hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon on 9/11.

It should be common knowledge to everyone at this stage that the towers collapsing due to the impact from the planes is complete and utter nonsense.

Mark takes this idea one step further and alleges that the reason why the planes could not have possibly brought down the Twin Towers or the Pentagon on 9/11 is because there were NO PLANES at all!

Instead, what was seen were volumetric 3D projections which were used to disguise the use of DEWs.

The hypothesis is presented in the two posts below and the presentation in the first one is especially compelling in my opinion:

9/11 Planes: 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology Vs Video Fakery and CGI
Is seeing believing, or believing seeing on 9/11?

Mark has also done good work around exploring the anomalies about some of the passengers on the alleged hijacked planes, which I personally think are very important and should be expanded further on:

Who is Gerald “Mark” Bingham?
An Independent Investigation
Vicki Yancey - American 77 Passenger Testifying Before the United States Congress in 1991
An Independent Investigation
9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Oddities
A Need For Clarification

I believe that there is a fairly good chance you haven’t been exposed to this information previously and if the hypothesis by both 9/11 Revisionist and Mark Conlon are correct (or even just one of them), it means that even the ‘official’ 9/11 conspiracy story is entirely false.

The information presented by these two individuals and Dr. Wood is too compelling to ignore in my opinion and the implications of it being the ACTUAL TRUTH are mind-blowing, to put it mildly.

The single most important implication was described very well by 9/11 Revisionist in his reply to me here:

With regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means an end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".

Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.

This video from the popular Why Files discusses the topic of free energy (as well as anti-gravity) with a bit of a ‘popular culture’ twist although the analysis is mostly solid in my opinion:

Finally, this interview Doc Malik did with Andrew Johnson serves as the perfect compliment to everything I discussed in this article:

This post by Andrew is a good companion to the above discussion:

Helping People Understand Where the Towers Went
An Odyssey

This is another good discussion:

Interview with 9/11 Revisionist, September 6, 2025
Narrative vs. evidence; Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum

Very keen to hear your thoughts on this potential new paradigm for the events of 23 years ago today.

Leave a comment and let me know what you think.